Before this class i was never in to poetry at all. Actually it was something i didn't look forward to in this class. For me i find it sometimes boring and hard to understand. I didn't like that fact that you could read a poem 10 times and get a different perspective each time. I like things that are concrete and have a clear theme and objective. Like an action movie, there is a main character who has some type of task he has to complete and you go along as he completes that task and then he's a big hero blah blah blah. In poetry everything is so vague and you never truly know what the author is trying to say unless you ask him. ( which i think the author would tell you anyway). The poems we read in class were in fact the opposite of what i thought they were going to be. they were very passionate and drew you in while listening. I always thought poetry as a list of metaphors in some crazy format left for the reader to interpret in there own way. But Brady showed us how easy it is to understand the themes using literary devices. She also picked poems that were far from boring and interesting to read
Looking Back
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Response to lecture on Idealism
Idealism was something that when brought up in class i felt i had a decent understanding of and it was a pretty self explanatory topic that wasn't hard to grasp. Everyone want's to be in an "ideal" spot of there life and there's always something better to be achieved. Being too idealistic could be a negative trait as we saw in "The Birthmark" by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The main character couldn't bare to see his wife less than perfect so he nonstop attempted to remove her birthmark which was her only flaw. By being so Idealistic he eventually killed his wife. I learned that there is much more to the theme of idealism then i had originally thought and it was very interesting for me and the rest of my class to deeper understand this concept completely.
Response to class lecture on Transcendentalism
Before this class i never heard of transcendentalism. Transcendentalism was a movement in the 19th century where philosophers would connect events and opinions to nature and the human spirit. We read a bunch of pieces from authors from this period and they were really unique. After reading a few you could really see the pattern they show in their pieces. I think if i was given a story to read and asked if the author was a transcendentalist i would be able to easily choose. Brady taught us this very well. To be able to present a topic that was never heard of by most students and have us understand it so in depth was truley remarkably. They way she explained it and how it works was perfect and i don't think one student left that class with any confusion on what transcendentalism was. Bravo Brady bravo.
What will your verse be?
Music and poetry are to art
forms that are very similar. In some obvious ways they are different but their
overall themes and they way they convey ideas are the same. The poems “Stop all
the clocks, cut off the telephone” by W.H. Auden and “To my dear and loving
husband” by Anne Bradstreet can both be compared to the song “Without You” by
David Guetta ft. Usher. Although every piece of poetry or music can be
interpreted differently, the overall theme and message these three pieces
present are similar.
The poem “To my dear and loving husband” is an overall positive piece that conveys the love a wife and husband have. In the song “Without you” Guetta expresses his live that he once had for someone. They both show two people how have or had a strong connection with one another. But although in Guetta’s song he no longer has the same connection with the person it still shows how strong love can be and how two people can be so strongly connected that when they are apart they are engulfed in sadness. In the poem the author wrote “While we live, in love lets so preserver, that when we live no more we may live ever” (Auden 470). This shows how strong a loving relationship can be.
The poem “To my dear and loving husband” is an overall positive piece that conveys the love a wife and husband have. In the song “Without you” Guetta expresses his live that he once had for someone. They both show two people how have or had a strong connection with one another. But although in Guetta’s song he no longer has the same connection with the person it still shows how strong love can be and how two people can be so strongly connected that when they are apart they are engulfed in sadness. In the poem the author wrote “While we live, in love lets so preserver, that when we live no more we may live ever” (Auden 470). This shows how strong a loving relationship can be.
Also the poem “Stop all the
clocks, cut off the telephone” shows a similar concept. This piece however has
a saddening mood to it unlike the other two. This poem is very deep and is full
of emotion. Again it shows how strong a relationship can be. The character in
this poem lost his loved one who he obviously had a loving relationship with.
He gives off an emotion of agony and by reading you can almost feel the pain
that he is feeling as you read. It is a very good piece. This poem is also
similar to the song “Without You” by
David Guetta” They both lose a loved one and express their sadness.
All three are very deep
pieces that take a lot of comprehension to really understand what the artists’
are trying to convey. They all show the strength of love, and how devastating
it is or would be to lose a loved one. One discusses the result of losing your
loved one, while the other emphasizes how strong love can be. Guettas song ties
both of them together giving both perspectives in his own unique way. Love is dangerously
powerful and isn’t something to be taken lightly.
Look Back On English 102
English has never been my favorite subject. I never enjoyed reading
much of anything and writing was never something I would do in my spare time.
In the past all the English teachers I’ve had have never tried to make English interesting.
Professor Brady gave our class the exact opposite of what I’ve grown accustom to
in English class. Brady is extremely passionate about what she does and being
in her class you can’t help but get involved. Most professors are extremely
boring and go by class after class giving the same boring lectures with no
enthusiasm and really makes going to class a drag. But this semester I looked forward to going
to Eng 102. There was never a day I left class without learning something and
left with something to think about for the rest of the week. I still to this day
every once and a while see or hear something that reminds me of a lecture from
Brady’s class. I truly enjoyed her class and Brady is probably the best teacher
I’ve had to date.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Post-Modernism reflected in Jhumpa Lahiri's "Interpreter of Maladies"
“The interpreter of Maladies” by Jhumpa Lahiri is a prime example of a post-modern work of literature. In Post modernism flaws are surfaced and people have a pursuit of self-interpretation of what reality is. For example when Mrs. Das reveals the truth to Mr. Kapasi that her son is the father of a man she had an affair with. This secret is a flaw of Mrs. Das and for her to come out and say it really embraces the post-modern feel of the story. At another point in the story Mrs. Das says “Stop calling me Mrs. Das. I’m twenty-eight, you probably have children my age.” (Lahiri 64). Again this shows how the post-modern way of thinking. People view society in a very individualistic way, therefore they have judgments based on the things they see and hear. Mrs. Das feels that Mr. Kapasi’s age and appearance would be unfit for her liking and his image reflects more of a father like character. Whereas, Mr. Kapasi had an entirely different image of the relationship they shared, and was demoralized by the truth.
Time has shown the vast changes in human behavior. Also no two human relationships are the same. The relationship you have with your parents is entirely unique and no two people on earth will have the same relationship. Of course there will be similarities, every parent child relationship have general standards and structure. This is all what makes defining human nature in depth impossible. Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi both have entirely different views of each other and of themselves. This also has to do with how the characters are described. Mr. Kapasi is told to be a hopeless romantic who would jump to any hint of a relationship. But Mrs. Das is almost the complete opposite. She views relationships as an in depth subject that she is not drawn to achieve with every person she meets. She believes in a “Mr. Right.”
The postmodern era gives a very unique feel to everyone involve. It has completely changed the ideas and principles people have. It gives more importance to the individual rather than a group. This was not the case at all for most periods in the past. “The interpreter of Maladies” by Jhumpa Lahiri shows post modernism and it’s effect on human behavior
Time has shown the vast changes in human behavior. Also no two human relationships are the same. The relationship you have with your parents is entirely unique and no two people on earth will have the same relationship. Of course there will be similarities, every parent child relationship have general standards and structure. This is all what makes defining human nature in depth impossible. Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi both have entirely different views of each other and of themselves. This also has to do with how the characters are described. Mr. Kapasi is told to be a hopeless romantic who would jump to any hint of a relationship. But Mrs. Das is almost the complete opposite. She views relationships as an in depth subject that she is not drawn to achieve with every person she meets. She believes in a “Mr. Right.”
The postmodern era gives a very unique feel to everyone involve. It has completely changed the ideas and principles people have. It gives more importance to the individual rather than a group. This was not the case at all for most periods in the past. “The interpreter of Maladies” by Jhumpa Lahiri shows post modernism and it’s effect on human behavior
"Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed."
If nobody never started the women’s right movement or America never wrote the declaration of independence. Women would have never received equal rights, and we would still be under control of Brittan. Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” He was saying that if African Americans didn’t demand their rights and fight for equality they will never get it, which is undoubtedly true.
“The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is a great example to prove this quote true. In the story women are completely controlled by men. She is labeled as mentally unstable and forced to be bed ridden until her “illness” has ran its course. In this time women had limited rights and everything they did had to overseen by their husbands. In one point of the play she says “I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good. But what is one to do?” (Gilman 317). She knows that what is being done to her is wrong and she has a real solution to the problems she is faced with. If nobody in history ever stood up for what they believed in like the woman in “The Yellow Wallpaper” did, there would never be any change. Woman would probably still be faced with the same things that this woman was.
Today, the lack of freedom that is shown in “The Yellow Wallpaper” is much more of a rarity. Although it still exists especially in other third world countries. Some countries still don’t believe in equal rights. For example in some middle eastern countries men and women don’t even get to choose their spouse. It is chosen by their parents and other circumstances at birth who they will be forced to live with for the rest of their lives. If those citizens never speak up and express they want and need for freedom, they might never get the chance to choose their own husband/wife. But if suddenly a group of people started to demand something be change, it is much more likely for it to be done.
“The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is a great example to prove this quote true. In the story women are completely controlled by men. She is labeled as mentally unstable and forced to be bed ridden until her “illness” has ran its course. In this time women had limited rights and everything they did had to overseen by their husbands. In one point of the play she says “I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good. But what is one to do?” (Gilman 317). She knows that what is being done to her is wrong and she has a real solution to the problems she is faced with. If nobody in history ever stood up for what they believed in like the woman in “The Yellow Wallpaper” did, there would never be any change. Woman would probably still be faced with the same things that this woman was.
Today, the lack of freedom that is shown in “The Yellow Wallpaper” is much more of a rarity. Although it still exists especially in other third world countries. Some countries still don’t believe in equal rights. For example in some middle eastern countries men and women don’t even get to choose their spouse. It is chosen by their parents and other circumstances at birth who they will be forced to live with for the rest of their lives. If those citizens never speak up and express they want and need for freedom, they might never get the chance to choose their own husband/wife. But if suddenly a group of people started to demand something be change, it is much more likely for it to be done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)